Resolving the Skills deficit – How?
How will the skills deficit be resolved if we concentrate only on apprenticeships? An elite cadre that are too few in number to make a significant difference. Is there not a case for a dual track training approach that allows staff to move between an educational, college, based approach to a pure training approach as their aptitude dictates and to train staff in the necessary skills immediately prior to them requiring a particular skill? Such a scheme would enable parks and the wider landscape maintenance sector to deal effectively with the skills deficit.
A further dilemma is that with the dire reductions in both parks finance and landscape maintenance specifications, are we not in danger of being unable to provide sufficient, any, opportunity for staff to acquire the range of skills specified in apprenticeships and skills training programmes? And just as important, to develop their proficiency?
In the 70s and 80s a system prevailed in local government – it was called scheme A & B – pioneered by the then, Local Government Training Board – that provided all staff with the opportunity to acquire skills and to do so at a pace that was compatible with the needs of the organisation and their abilities. The training and education was also undertaken when required and reinforced by on-the-job training. This approach was augmented by the requirement in skilled horticulturists’ job descriptions to pass on their skills to the less skilled, many an apprentice and trainee has benefited from that approach. Those requirements do not seem to exist in the 21 Century. Why?
Some many questions . . .


